Which of the following is NOT an example of involuntary conveyance of title?

Involuntary conveyance of title refers to the transfer of property ownership that occurs without the owner's agreement or consent. In this context, dedication, which entails a voluntary act where a property owner openly declares a portion of their land for public use (such as a road or park), does not fit the definition of involuntary conveyance. This act is typically initiated by the property owner who chooses to dedicate the land for community benefit, thereby indicating intent and agreement.

On the other hand, foreclosure, operation of law, and adverse possession are all processes where title can change hands without the owner's explicit consent. Foreclosure often occurs when a lender takes ownership of a property after the borrower defaults on a mortgage, operation of law encompasses situations where ownership changes due to legal statutes (such as when a person dies and property passes to heirs), and adverse possession involves a party obtaining legal title to property by possessing it in a manner that is hostile, open, continuous, and exclusive for a statutory period despite the original owner's lack of consent.

Thus, the distinction lies in the fact that dedication is a voluntary action by the property owner, which means it cannot accurately be described as an involuntary conveyance of title.