Which of the following would not be considered a blanket encumbrance in a subdivision?

A subdivision lots improvement assessment bond would not be considered a blanket encumbrance because it specifically relates to the improvements for individual lots within the subdivision rather than encompassing the entire property. This type of bond is primarily concerned with the financing of specific infrastructure improvements—like roads, utilities, and other enhancements—associated with individual lots or designated areas in the subdivision.

In contrast, a mortgage on the entire subdivision, a tax lien on the property, and a construction loan for development all involve encumbrances that apply to the entirety of the subdivision rather than to any single lot. These encumbrances can affect the transferability and marketability of all properties within the subdivision, thereby meeting the definition of a blanket encumbrance, which typically attaches to more than one property or lot.